not the particular values of any one moral doctrine; they are values that are shared by the many reasonable comprehensive moral doctrines citizens hold (Rawls 1993, 227230). Equity feminists generally hold that no rights are violated when employers, educational institutions, public accommodations or associations discriminate against women (see section.5). Who can seriously doubt that the power which a millionaire, who may be my employer, has over me is very much less than that which the smallest bureaucrat possesses who wields the coercive power of the state and on whose discretion it depends how.
The, libertarian, vote: Swing Voters, Tea Parties, and the
1.1 Personal Autonomy.1.1 Procedural Accounts of Personal Autonomy. So the synopsis of Egyptian Mythology larger casethat all liberty-restricting policies harm women, or that a minimal state (or no state) would be better for women overallhas not been made convincingly (Warnick 2003). And they shift, change, and even die off. . Comprehensive liberal feminisms are grounded in moral doctrines. As the protection and promotion of citizens' autonomy is the appropriate role of the state on the liberal view, liberal feminists hold that the state can and should be the women's movement's ally in promoting women's autonomy. But equity feminists hold that, because women are not legally required, or actually forced in some other way, to choose traditional roles, their choices are not coerced, and thus state remedies are inappropriate. The capabilities list, she argues, can be shared by citizens holding a wide variety of comprehensive conceptions of the good life, and thus should be able to function as a foundation for a political liberalism (Nussbaum 2000b, 76 fn38). Laws against prostitution are coercivethe state can put a violator in jail or force her to pay a fine. Such stereotyping and discrimination affects some racial, ethnic and cultural groups in particularly pernicious ways.